Discussing foodscapes at ESA’s Consumption Conference 2020

The European Sociological Association’s midterm conference for the consumption research network kicked off late August. The conference took place online, at Zoom, due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

FOOD2GATGHER had a designated roundtable to discuss the use of foodscapes in researching migration and public spaces.

The roundtable started with some presentations of FOOD2GATHER members Gun Roos, Laura Terragni and Helene Teigen, and Ecem Erol, who is not a part of the project but has experience with foodscapes and public spaces from an architecture perspective.

Gun gave an overview of the FOOD2GATHER project, its aims and uses of foodscapes as a concept. Then Laura followed up by talking about mapping the regulations and assistance programs, providing an overview of the systems that refugees meet when arriving in Norway and how they may use food as a tool. Helene complemented Laura’s presentation by presenting a brief media analysis, seeking to capture discourses surrounding food and integration. The presentation looked at how Norwegian media covered the refugee crisis of 2015, using food as a lenses for investigation. Lastly, Ecem’s presentation was focused on children and foodscapes, and how to create foodscapes in cities through architecture.

Before the session, the presenters had prepared some discussion points to engage the audience, but did not get to these as the questions and discussion following the presentations took the remainder of the hour we were given. The discussion revolved mostly around the concept of foodscapes. What it actually is, how we are using it in FOOD2GATHER, how it can be used in other research settings.

For some in the session, the concept was difficult to grasp as it was perceived to include everything, and as such may as well include nothing. To FOOD2GATHER, this is a concept in development, and a part of the project is to continue to learn about and evolve this concept.

Although the online format of the session was unfamiliar for most of us, it worked surprisingly well. No technical difficulties, and participants other than the presenters engaged in the discussion. All in all, it was a very interesting and interactive session, where some questions and topics was aired for further discussion and exploration in the time to come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *